Photo distribution is the part of an event that quietly consumes a team: thousands of images, hundreds of people, and no practical way to match one to the other. Eventiere does the matching, and every attendee receives only the photos they are actually in.
Photo sharing and photo distribution are not the same job. Sharing puts a gallery somewhere and asks people to look through it. Distribution decides who each photo belongs to, and delivers it.
That difference matters most at scale. A guest at a 2,000-person conference will not scroll 8,000 images to find the four they appear in. They will not look at all, which is the same outcome as never having taken the photos.
An AI photo distribution platform closes that gap. A guest takes one selfie, and the platform returns their photos. No album to browse, no name to search, no app to install.
The organiser's work ends at the upload. Everything after that runs without anyone watching it.
Conferences and corporate events. Attendees want their photos while the event is still worth posting about, not a week later in a shared drive.
Festivals and large public events. Volume is the whole problem. Distribution is the only approach that survives tens of thousands of photos.
Sports and marathons. Bib numbers and faces both work, so a runner can be found either way.
Weddings and private events. Guests get their own photos without a public gallery, and albums can be held back behind a code.
Automatic does not have to mean open. An album can be public, private, or secret, where guests reveal it with a code you give them. A whole event can sit behind a single code if it should not be public at all.
Organisers decide whether guests are asked for consent before their selfie is used, because different events and different countries answer that question differently.
The free plan covers a real event, not a sandbox. Start there and see what distribution does to your photo workflow.